So, on my way home from work, I realized something.
I was not fully at peace with the aftermath of my exchange with the member of my staff because I was judging how he responded to my email. He did not respond in the way I that I would have liked him to respond.
"Note taken."
I was dissatisfied by that.
Not, "You're absolutely right" or "I apologize" or "I just wasn't thinking" but "Note taken."
Now, putting ego aside, we all played our parts.
I spoke up where I felt I wanted to speak up and in that moment he played his part as well by responding in the only way he felt he could.
Why then should I not allow him to respond in the way that he wants?
I was not fully at peace because I was still finding him guilty. Maybe it would have been different if he had responded with, "You're wrong" or "That's your problem." And had he done that, I would have had to address that and gone back and forth until some outcome had come to pass.
But he didn't.
He acknowledged what I asked him to do--he took the note.
Therefore any witholding of peace on my part, really doesn't make sense. Ultimately, I can only be responsible for myself--my intentions and my actions.
Trying to control his response or judging his response as right or wrong is beside the point. Looking to him to react a certain way as the determining factor of whether I am at peace or not is dangerous. He's not responsible for my happiness. I am.
I took action. I feel good about that.
As for his response? I must accept it as is and let it be.
No comments:
Post a Comment